Konrad Achillis schreef op 2 oktober 2010:

Dear Bart,
I am just flabbergasted reading your endles reasonings about the so-called non existence of GOD.
You cannot undo HIM.
You cannot even touch HIM.
But HE can touch you - with his grace.
Konrad. 

 

Reactie:

Dear Konrad,

To this I can only reply with Hitchen’s dictum: What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

With kind regards,

Bart Klink

 

Wie zijn er online?

We hebben 51 gasten en geen leden online

Geef je mening

Welke positie over het bestaan van god(en) onderschrijft u?

Bekende atheïsten

Jean Le Rond d'AlembertJean Le Rond d'Alembert, 18e eeuwse wiskundige, natuurkundige, filosoof en encyclopedist.

Citaat

It is often said, mainly by the "no-contests", that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?

~ Richard Dawkins

Konrad Achillis schreef op 2 oktober 2010:

Dear Bart,
I am just flabbergasted reading your endles reasonings about the so-called non existence of GOD.
You cannot undo HIM.
You cannot even touch HIM.
But HE can touch you - with his grace.
Konrad. 

 

Reactie:

Dear Konrad,

To this I can only reply with Hitchen’s dictum: What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

With kind regards,

Bart Klink

Wie zijn er online?

We hebben 51 gasten en geen leden online

Geef je mening

Welke positie over het bestaan van god(en) onderschrijft u?

Bekende atheïsten

Jean Le Rond d'AlembertJean Le Rond d'Alembert, 18e eeuwse wiskundige, natuurkundige, filosoof en encyclopedist.

Citaat

It is often said, mainly by the "no-contests", that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?

~ Richard Dawkins