You keep accusing me of blasphemy all of the time, but I cannot be convicted of a victimless crime.
~ Dan Barker
Citaat D. BarkerYou keep accusing me of blasphemy all of the time, but I cannot be convicted of a victimless crime. ~ Dan Barker |
Wie zijn er online?We hebben 44 gasten en geen leden online Geef je mening
Welke positie over het bestaan van god(en) onderschrijft u?
Bekende atheïsten PZ Myers, Amerikaanse bioloog, en professor aan de Universiteit van Minnesota Morris (UMM). Hij is de auteur van de science blog genaamd "Pharyngula". PZ is een bekend atheïst, criticus van intelligent design (ID) en het creationisme in het algemeen, en is een activist in de Amerikaanse creatie-evolutie controversie.
CitaatIt is often said, mainly by the "no-contests", that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies? ~ Richard Dawkins |
You keep accusing me of blasphemy all of the time, but I cannot be convicted of a victimless crime.
~ Dan Barker
We hebben 44 gasten en geen leden online
PZ Myers, Amerikaanse bioloog, en professor aan de Universiteit van Minnesota Morris (UMM). Hij is de auteur van de science blog genaamd "Pharyngula". PZ is een bekend atheïst, criticus van intelligent design (ID) en het creationisme in het algemeen, en is een activist in de Amerikaanse creatie-evolutie controversie.
It is often said, mainly by the "no-contests", that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?
~ Richard Dawkins